Methodology · Food

How Luminelle scores food.

Scan a food barcode and Luminelle gives it a score from 0 to 100 with the reasons behind it. The score weighs three things - how the product fares nutritionally, what the additives in it are known to do, and how processed it is - and every additive level points to the regulator or study it comes from. It is not medical advice, and it never calls a legal product dangerous.

Cosmetics are scored differently. That method is on the cosmetic methodology page.

The short version

  • Nutrition is worth 60 points, additives 30 and processing 10.
  • A high-risk additive, processed meat or a Nutri-Score E caps the score at 49, the top of “Poor”, however good the rest looks.
  • Each additive level is a rule applied to a regulator's finding, with the source one tap away.
  • No ingredient list means no overall score. A missing list is never read as “no additives”.
  • Personal notes - pregnancy guidance, and ingredients you've asked us to point out - are shown beside the score and never change it.

The formula

PartPointsFrom
Nutrition60Nutri-Score (2023 method), mapped onto a band per letter.
Additives30Evidence-graded risk levels. Each risk group costs its points once.
Processing10NOVA group: 1 or 2 scores 10, 3 scores 5, 4 scores 0. Unknown scores 5.

The three parts are added and rounded, then capped at 49 if any cap applies. Labels follow the score: 90 and above is Excellent, 70 Good, 50 Fair, and below 50 Poor.

Nutrition

Nutrition is the Nutri-Score under its 2023 algorithm, as computed by Open Food Facts from the product's nutrition table. It counts energy, sugars, saturated fat and salt against protein, fibre and fruit, vegetables and legumes, with separate tables for drinks, for fats, oils, nuts and seeds, for cheese and for red meat. Where a product has to be prepared, the prepared values are used. Open Food Facts tells drinks from foods by their categories. So when a product whose first ingredient is carbonated water has been graded on the food table, we grade it again as a drink from the same figures.

Each letter owns a band of the 60 points, and within the band fewer Nutri-Score points score higher. The letter decides the band, so a B can never score below a C.

GradeScoreFoods (points)Fats, oils, nutsDrinks
A48 to 600 or lower (clamped at −10)−6 or lower (clamped at −12)Water only, which scores 60
B36 to 471 to 2−5 to 22 or lower
C24 to 353 to 103 to 103 to 6
D12 to 2311 to 1811 to 187 to 9
E0 to 1119 or higher (clamped at 40)19 or higher (clamped at 40)10 or higher (clamped at 20)

When we call sugars, saturated fat or salt low, moderate or high, we use the UK front-of-pack traffic-light thresholds per 100 g, or per 100 ml for drinks. These words don't change the score; they describe the label. Nutri-Score's own points run on a stretched scale, so 33 g of sugar is only 9 of 15 points. DHSC/FSA guidance, November 2016.

Per 100 g (drinks per 100 ml)LowHigh
Sugars5 g or less (drinks 2.5 g)over 22.5 g (drinks 11.25 g)
Saturated fat1.5 g or less (drinks 0.75 g)over 5 g (drinks 2.5 g)
Salt0.3 g or lessover 1.5 g (drinks 0.75 g)

Additives

The additive part starts at 30. Each additive is given the highest level whose rule it meets, and each level takes points once per risk group - three azo colours cost the same as one, because the finding is about the group. Anything not in the knowledge base is shown as not assessed and costs nothing.

LevelRuleEffect
HighAuthorisation withdrawn or revoked on safety grounds in the EU or by the US FDA; or a regulator found a health concern at current exposure and IARC links it to cancer (Group 1 or 2A).Additives score 0 and the total is capped at 49
ModerateEFSA concluded a safety concern, set only a temporary acceptable daily intake, or found realistic intake above it; or IARC Group 2B plus an active regulator reassessment; or a mandatory EU health warning label.−10
LimitedCleared by regulators, but a later human study links it to harm with a supporting mechanism, or WHO recommends against the use; or an IARC Group 2B contaminant whose intake limit was since reaffirmed.−4
WatchA worst-case intake note, or a signal from a single study that regulators have not taken up.Shown, not scored
No concernRe-evaluated with no safety concern at reported uses.0
Not assessedNot in the knowledge base yet. Never read as safe.0

These are the additives with a level above no concern, and the source each one rests on.

AdditiveE-numberLevelSource
Titanium dioxideE171HighEFSA 2021; Regulation (EU) 2022/63
Erythrosine (Red 3)E127HighUS FDA revocation, January 2025
Brominated vegetable oilE443HighUS FDA revocation, July 2024
Potassium bromateE924HighIARC Group 2B; not authorised in the EU
PropylparabensE216, E217HighEFSA 2004; Directive 2006/52/EC
Red 2GE128HighEFSA 2007; EU suspension
Nitrites and nitratesE249 to E252HighIARC Group 2A; EFSA 2023 nitrosamines
Partially hydrogenated oilsBy nameHighUS FDA determination, 2015
SulphitesE220 to E228ModerateEFSA 2022
Phosphate additivesE338 to E341, E343, E450 to E452ModerateEFSA 2019
Synthetic colours with the EU warning labelE102, E104, E110, E122, E124, E129ModerateRegulation (EC) 1333/2008, Annex V
GlutamatesE620 to E625ModerateEFSA 2017
Aluminium additivesE173, E520 to E523, E541, E554 to E559ModerateEFSA 2008; Regulation (EU) 380/2012
CarrageenansE407, E407aModerateEFSA 2018
ErythritolE968ModerateEFSA 2023
BHAE320ModerateIARC Group 2B; US FDA reassessment, 2026
Non-sugar sweetenersE950 to E969LimitedWHO guideline, 2023
Cellulose thickeners, including CMCE460 to E468LimitedBMJ 2023; Gastroenterology 2022
Mono- and diglyceridesE471, E472a to E472eLimitedPLoS Medicine 2024; BMJ 2023
Ammonia caramelsE150c, E150dLimitedIARC Group 2B (4-MEI); EFSA 2011
Synthetic blue and green coloursE132, E133, E143LimitedUS FDA, April 2025
SorbatesE200 to E203WatchEFSA 2019; BfR 2026
BenzoatesE210 to E213WatchEFSA 2016
PolysorbatesE432 to E436WatchEFSA 2015
Emulsifier estersE473, E481, E482, E491 to E495WatchEFSA re-evaluations
AzodicarbonamideE927aWatchNot authorised in the EU (Regulation 1333/2008)

Regulatory status is shown as fact next to the level - “banned as a food additive in the EU since 2022”, “US FDA revoked” - and a product sold legally is described as legal. The words used are the regulators' own.

Processing

Processing is the NOVA group Open Food Facts assigns from the ingredient list: 1 unprocessed or minimally processed, 2 a processed culinary ingredient, 3 processed, 4 ultra-processed. The app shows what put a product in its group, such as a flavouring or an emulsifier. When the group can't be worked out, the part scores 5 of 10 and says so. Plain water with nothing added counts as unprocessed.

US products

About half of the US products in Open Food Facts are missing an ingredient list or a full nutrition table. When a product is missing, or can't be scored from Open Food Facts, Luminelle looks it up in USDA FoodData Central, the US Department of Agriculture's public database of manufacturers' labels. A USDA record is only used when it can be scored in full, and replaces the Open Food Facts one whole rather than being mixed with it.

USDA publishes no Nutri-Score, so Luminelle computes one from the label, to the same 2023 rules; our implementation matches Open Food Facts' grade and points on every product we test it against where Open Food Facts scored the label itself rather than estimated values. Three differences are marked as estimated in the app, and each can only lower a score:

  • US labels don't state the share of fruit, vegetables and legumes, so it counts as zero - except for 100% juices.
  • Where a label omits sugars or saturated fat but gives carbohydrates or total fat, the missing line is scored at its ceiling.
  • Additives are found by name (“Red 40”, “mono- and diglycerides”), and processing is only ever read as ultra-processed or unknown - text alone can't prove a food is unprocessed.

Processed meat

IARC classifies processed meat - cured, smoked or salted, including “uncured” products preserved with celery powder - as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on colorectal cancer. Any processed meat is capped at 49 whatever additives it lists, so a nitrite-free label can't outscore the product it replaces.

Your food preferences

In Settings you can ask Luminelle to point out seed oils, added sugar, flavourings, gums and thickeners, artificial sweeteners or palm oil. A product that contains one gets a note under “For you”. These are preferences, not findings: several are popular rules that the evidence doesn't support as health risks - the American Heart Association still recommends seed oils over saturated fat - so they never move the score.

Labels are checked the same way whatever language they're printed in. Open Food Facts reads each ingredient into a language-neutral entry - dextrose, zahăr and Zucker all become added sugar - and we check those entries, and the label text only for what it couldn't read. If too much of a list can't be read, the note says so rather than staying quiet. Pregnancy notes work the same way.

When there is no score

  • Nutrition only. The ingredient list is missing, or too much of it couldn't be read (more than 30% unrecognised, though one unrecognised ingredient is fine on a list of three or more). The Nutri-Score part is shown; the total is not. Single-ingredient foods - water, oils, honey, eggs, plain nuts - are scored without a list.
  • Not enough data. The nutrition table is missing or physically impossible, for example more calories in kcal than in kJ. It is also not scored when the kcal and kJ figures can't describe the same 100 g (more than 20% apart). That usually means some figures are per serving.
  • Not rated. Nutri-Score doesn't rate alcohol, chewing gum, baby food, supplements, or plain tea, coffee, herbs and spices, so neither do we.

Sources and licences

SourceRole
Open Food FactsProduct data: nutrition, ingredients, additives, Nutri-Score and NOVA. Open Database Licence; photos CC BY-SA.
USDA FoodData CentralUS product labels (nutrition and ingredients) when Open Food Facts lacks a product or can’t score it. Public domain.
Santé publique FranceThe Nutri-Score (2023 algorithm) conditions of use.
EFSAFood additive re-evaluations, intake limits and safety conclusions.
IARC MonographsCancer hazard classifications, including processed meat.
US FDARevocations and reassessments of food additives and colours.
WHOGuidelines on non-sugar sweeteners and trans fat.
European UnionRegulation (EC) 1333/2008 on food additives and its warning labels.
NHS and US FDAPregnancy and breastfeeding food guidance, shown under “For you”. Never scored.

Product data contains information from Open Food Facts, available under the Open Database Licence.

Changelog

DateChange
23 September 2026First version: nutrition, additives and processing; processed-meat finding; pregnancy notes.
23 September 2026US products: USDA FoodData Central as a second source, with our own Nutri-Score and NOVA reading for its labels.
23 September 2026Food preferences: opt-in notes for ingredients you choose. Never scored.
23 September 2026Low, moderate and high for sugars, saturated fat and salt now follow the UK front-of-pack thresholds. Nutrition tables whose kcal and kJ disagree are no longer scored.
23 September 2026Food preferences and pregnancy notes read Open Food Facts’ language-neutral ingredient entries, so a label in any language is checked the same way; an unreadable list is said to be one.
23 September 2026Errors in a label’s per-serving column no longer void its per-100 g grade. Sodas graded on the food table are graded as drinks. Plain water counts as unprocessed. Coffee that makes up a real share of a product counts as caffeine.
24 September 2026A jar of honey, sugar or plain syrup is no longer called “added sugar” - it is the sugar. Carob seed flour and guar flour count as the gums they are.
24 September 2026One unrecognised ingredient no longer stops a list of three or more from being scored.

Corrections

If you think an additive is at the wrong level, or a source is out of date, write to info@luminelle.ai with the citation.

Food scoring methodology: nutrition, additives, processing | Luminelle